FACEBOOK GATE

WE LIVE IN THE ECONOMY OF THE DATA, NOAH HARARI WRITTEN ITS BEST SELLERS, HOMO DEUS, THE ERA OF DATISM, IS A WORLD WHERE ALL MARKETING IS BASED ON DATA. YOU CAN THINK THAT IT IS RIGHT OR NOT JUST BUT IT IS SO AND THE RULES WILL WRITE THEM WHO HAS THE MARKET AND UNTIL TODAY HAVE BEEN GOOD TO EVERYONE. SINCE YEARS AND IT HAS BEEN TRANSPARENT FOR EVERYONE, TECH MULTINATIONALS GAIN USING THE DATA. THERE IS AN ENTIRE ECOSYSTEM THAT SPREADS DATA ON THE NETWORK THROUGH THE API (APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE). THE PROFILE OF THE AVERAGE USER TRAVEL THAT IS A PLEASURE. WHO IS THE MOST DISSOLVED IN THIS VICENZA? THE AVERAGE FINISHING USER OVV, WHICH USES THESE SYSTEMS, THESE SEARCH ENGINES BY INSERTING ITS PERSONAL DATA AND DOES NOT ACCEPTABLE THAT THESE DATA ARE ARCHIVED, ANALYZED AND USED TO PROPOSE OR SELL SOMETHING OR TO CONVIN VOICE FOR SOMEONE. CONCLUDING, THERE IS NO SURPRISE, EVERYBODY KNOW EVERYTHING, IMPROPER USE OR VIOLATION OF TEMPS OF VIEWS, THE TRUE REASON FOR WHICH FACEBOOK AND CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICS ARE IN THE CYCLONE AND ‘THAT IS DISPLAYED THE CASE.
IF THERE WAS NOT THE NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE AND IF TRUMP HAD NOT WON THIS ROBO IF THEY WOULD HAVE NO YARN. NOW WILL THERE BE REGULATIONS FOR FACEBOOK? MAYBE BUT IT IS TO CONSIDER THAT THE TWO COLOSSI, FACEBOOK AND GOOGLE DOMINATE, THE WORLD OF BUSINESS WITH THIS MODEL WHICH.
THEREFORE YOU CHANGE BUSINESS MODELS AND ALGORITHMS, FOR EXAMPLE MARK FROM TOMORROW MORNING ANNOUNCES TO STOP THE ADS (THE TRENDS OF PURCHASE OF THE VARIOUS USER PROFILES), AND DECIDED TO PAY EACH YEAR A NUMBER FOR SUBSCRIPTION THIS CHANGE WILL BECOME A DRAMA, BECAUSE THE SHAREHOLDERS WOULD CAUSE IT, – WHAT DO YOU KILL THE GALLINA FROM THE GOLDEN EGGS-?
THE SENSE OF THIS VICENZA IS THAT ALL OF US WE SHOULD CONSIDER OUR DATA WITH GREATER ATTENTION. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT PRIVACY, THE AVERAGE COMMENT IS ALWAYS “I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, I LIKE THAT IT’S FREE AND FORWARD”. THIS REASONING BRINGS A PRICE TO PAY THAT IS THE PRICE OF HANDLING WITH NO NEEDS REPORTING ACCOUNT. BECAUSE WHEN SOMEONE HAS YOUR DATA IN YOUR HANDS OF PURCHASE, YOUR CONTACTS, BECOMES VERY EASY TO START HAMMERS WITH THE PROPOSALS TO MAKE YOU BUY OR VOTE SOMEONE.

HOPE IS THAT THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES AS FOR BLOCK CHAIN ​​EXAMPLE DECENTRALIZE THIS POWER TO RETURN A LITTLE IN THE HANDS OF THE CITIZENS.

the case:
After the hearing of the Facebook CEO, the senators appeared skeptical, but also uncertain about the decisions to be made. The young businessman in front of the American Senate after the scandal Facebook claims to have made a mistake, and the title goes back to the stock market. Capitol Hill, the huge task that the CEO has had: explaining to American senators how the colossus will try to protect privacy and what were the errors that led to the Cambridge Analytica scandal and the spread of fake news by Russian trolls during the 2016 US presidential election.
“We are conducting an internal investigation and if we find out that there are applications that do not respect our rules we will suspend them from the service. And now I can only apologize for the abuses that have been made on the accounts of our users and promise that the same mistakes will not be made, “Zuckerberg said, stopping for short breaks, showing little confidence in some steps and giving short and robotic answers. at least in the first minutes of the long testimony. “It was a mistake to trust the word of Cambridge Analytica,” said the CEO, arguing that the data that Facebook collects are a limited number and are not shared with external companies.
Finding a balance with the senators was very difficult: Zuckerberg had to give the impression of being able to improve the platform without the need for direct intervention by Washington. This is for a very important reason: the colossus is not useful to open a front in America, as already under pressure from the authorities in Europe. But it seems that the positions of the senators go in the opposite direction.
Both the president of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Charles Grassley, and that of the Trade Commission, John Thune, have argued that perhaps the time has come to lay down privacy rules for the tech giants. “They believed that the industry could regulate itself, but now my colleagues and I have the doubt that it is not. Facebook was born as an example of the American dream now you have the task of not turning it into a nightmare of privacy ». Zuckerberg has argued that perhaps “some laws may be positive” to regulate the sector, but that does not necessarily have to be similar to the European ones, given that each country has its own sensitivity.
In addition to the question of privacy, Zuckerberg had to talk about incitement to hatred on the web and the diffusion